Due to the recent
nuclear crisis in Japan, we've seen much more technical jargon than
usual on major news stories. A reason for this is that radiation physics
is a highly technical field and even quantifying radiation can be very
complicated: a shift of a few decimal places can mean the difference
between no risk and a major radiological hazard. Even the units are new -
how many people have ever used 'becquerel' or 'half-life' in a casual
conversation?
In conjunction of the new language hitting
newspapers and TV screens, we've seen a great push to put radiation in
perspective. This basic education goes a long way to help people make
choices on how much they should worry about what is going on in Japan
and what they can do to protect themselves. Visual examples are popular
such as this one on xkcd.com,
as well as thorough explanations discussed here
by Harvard Medical School.
In supporting this movement, we recently
released a Radiation
Basics Sheet that we put together with data from the World Nuclear
Association and US Environmental Protection Agency. We included some
relative doses such as how much radiation you'll get from watching a
year of TV, how much from a chest x-ray, and how much you'll get from
flying across the US. We hope that this information can be used to turn
dispel fears and boost confidence.
Our sheet was recently featured on the blog of
STORMWATER (a journal for surface water quality professionals). The post
What
do the Numbers Actually Mean? is very informative and talks
about radiation contamination in Tokyo's tap water. We're excited that
someone is putting this information to good use, and we're grateful to
STORMWATER for the coverage.
If you would like more information to help you
put radiation risks in perspective, we here at D-tect Systems have
experts in the radiation detection field who can provide more
information by email (info@dtectsystems.com)
or even on the phone (801.495.2310).
D-tect Systems is
supplier of advanced radiation and chemical detection equipment sold
around the world. www.dtectsystems.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment